Member Wall

   Bettijo
   
    Reload Wall
    Photos by Owner
    Members Photos

    Login
 

TheConnection Walls
29 walls

     Main Page
The Lobby
     Blessings
     Coffee Klatch
     Comments
Suggestions
     Computers
&Tech Issues
     Crafts
     Dogs, Cats
& Critters
     Events
     Faith
     Gardening &
Landscaping
     Health & Diet
     Household Hints
     Jokes
     Movies & Reviews
     Music
     Nostalgia
     Pet Peeves
     Photography
     Politics
     The Range
2nd Amendment
     Recipes
     The Road
Automobilia
     Shopper's Beware
Caveat Emptor
     Sports
     Suggested Reading
     Suggested Viewing/Listening
     Travel
     Veterans' Page
& Militaria
     Weird
But True

Members Photos
0 out of 0
see all







Bettijo



   Bettijo posted on Household Hints  Smart LED system lets you turn on lights from afar
Never come home to a dark house again

If you could control your home’s lighting from anywhere using your smart phone or tablet, would you? Several manufacturers now offer remote-control LEDs and the lightbulb experts at Consumer Reports are testing Connected by TCP a smart lighting system for the home. Here’s what we’ve found so far.

We paid $50 at Home Depot for a Connected by TCP system that includes two LEDs and a gateway that enables you to control the bulbs. In our initial tests, it was easy to set up the hardware, install the app, and navigate the menus. The system was fairly intuitive but if you get stuck we found that the TCP website was helpful and so was their customer service when we had a question. You can use a smart phone, tablet, or personal computer and your wireless router or you can buy TCP’s battery-powered remote control for $20 to control the LEDs while you’re home. TCP says the remote works within 150 feet of the bulbs.

Remote control away from home, using a smart device, was a cinch to set up and worked smoothly. We were able to turn the lights on and off and dim them to low from wherever we were. The app provides timers so you can set up the bulbs to go on and off at different times and different days. TCP says you can control up to 250 bulbs, including the company’s smart CFLs. To buy more LEDs for this system you’ll pay about $17 for a 60-watt replacement for lamps and ceiling fixtures (A19 LEDs in lightbulb lingo ) and $25 for a BR30 reflector that replaces a 65-watt incandescent.

As replacements for 60-watt incandescents, these LEDs were just as bright and cast a warm light while using about 12 watts each in our initial tests. And when it comes to accurately showing the colors of objects, the LEDs were good at it and in line with others we’ve tested. They appear to evenly cast light in all directions but we haven’t tested them for this yet. And they’re supposed to last about 23 years when used 3 hours a day.

The TCP Connected LEDs are the pragmatic cousin to the Philips’ Hue smart device-enabled LEDs, which are fun and party ready and allow you to change the colors of the lights. Think of the possibilities. You’re too tired to go upstairs and turn off the lights. You don’t like coming home to a dark house. You’re on vacation but want to give the impression that your house is occupied. Your elderly parents or a disabled sibling have a hard time moving about. Remote controlled lighting is here.

In addition to testing these systems, Consumer Reports has lightbulb Ratings of the best replacement LEDs, CFLs, and halogen bulbs.
—Kimberly Janeway
November 5 at 10:15 EST .

   14 people like this.



   Balogreene  Thanks for the info. We never all three leave at the same time, but, as a techno-geek, I want one.
November 6 at 17:14 EST .

  12 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Main Page The Lobby  




http://www.FreeAtLastPAC.com

You are not Mary's cause and you are certainly not her charity. You are just a vote - nothing less, nothing more. You are just a means to an end, so that she remains in power.
November 4 at 09:51 EST .

   4 people like this.



   Bettijo  Written by Allen West on October 1, 2014

This short video may just be the most powerful message of the 2014 midterm election cycle. Lousiana State Senator Elbert Guillory, who made the courageous decision to switch from the Democrat party to the Republican, gives his reason why.

You can change the location in the video from Academy Street to any street in the black community and the result is the same — including my own Boulevard Avenue in Atlanta. It’s easy — actually cowardly — to attack Senator Guillory and hurl epithets, which will probably appear in the comments section here – I know them well. However, men and women such as Elbert and myself refuse to be modern-day slaves on the progressive socialist 21st century economic plantation where the harvest is all about votes.
November 4 at 09:53 EST .

  5 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Health & Diet  Deciphering Egg Labels
Eggs are a nutrition powerhouse. They are a very affordable source of protein and nutrients. So eat eggs!
Once upon a time, you would go to the grocery store and purchase a dozen eggs. Today, things are more complicated, as there are many different labels on the carton. The labels refer to the living conditions of the hens and how they are fed. But they are very confusing. Some are outright marketing gimmicks. Here's what you need to know.
• Antibiotic-free, Medication-free - Unregulated term, can mean anything.
• Cage-free - The hens "reside" inside large barns or warehouses. They are required to have outdoor access, but the amount, duration, and quality of outdoor access is undefined.
• Certified Organic - "USDA certified organic" is a certain improvement over standard living conditions for hens. They are fed an organic, all-vegetarian diet free of antibiotics and pesticides. The hens are housed cage-free in large barns, and may or may not see the outdoors. They may be de-beaked (to prevent pecking their peers ), and starved (to induce molting, which leads to more egg production ).
• Farm Fresh - meaningless.
• Fertile - The hens were living with roosters, which means they were likely cage-free.
• Free-range or Free-roaming - This is an unregulated term, but generally implies that the hens are not in cages, reside in a barn and have access to the outdoors. The extent of outdoor access is not defined.
• Hormone-free - Marketing gimmick. Hens never get treated with hormones.
• Natural, All Natural - this is a meaningless marketing term.
• Omega-3 enriched - the hens were fed either fish oil or flaxseed. You get the omega-3 second hand. Omega-3 eggs are unregulated, so you won't necessarily know how much and what type of omega-3 you're actually getting.
• Pasture-raised - Unregulated term, but usually means that the hen spends the majority of the year outdoors engaging in natural activities such as foraging. Debeaking and starvation are still allowed.
• Pasteurized - the eggs were heated to about 110 degrees Fahrenheit for half an hour or longer in order to pasteurize them. There is no regulation of this term.
• United Egg Producers Certified - meaningless.
• Vegetarian-fed - no animal byproducts in feed. Keep in mind that chickens are omnivores, and will eat bugs, mice, and any other animal small enough for them to peck and swallow.
Beyond organic, there are several third party certification systems that you may encounter in specialty shops or farmer markets:
• Animal Welfare Approved - flocks can be no greater than 500 hens. The hens are housed cage-free and must have continuous access to outdoor vegetation. Debeaking and starvation are prohibited, and the feed provided is vegetarian.
• American Humane Certified - there are 4 levels of certification. Colony cages - larger cages than standard, but still tiny. Cage-free - hens are housed in large barns and no outdoor access is required. Free range - outdoor access is required, but no duration is specified. Pastured - Outdoor access with substantial vegetation for each hen.
• Certified Humane - Divided to three levels. Regular: hens are cage-free, starvation is prohibited, but debeaking

   November 3 at 12:03 EST .

   14 people like this.



   Bettijo  • Certified Humane - Divided to three levels. Regular: hens are cage-free, starvation is prohibited, but debeaking is allowed. Free Range: at least 6 hours of sunlight required daily, but it can be without any vegetation. The highest level is Pasture-raised and requires at least 6 hours a day of pasture access - the hens eat off the land, not just feed.
• Food Alliance Certified - cage-free hens and access to outdoors for at least 8 hours a day. Debeaking is allowed but starvation is not.
Bottom Line
Now that you know what the labels mean, choose the eggs that work within your values and pocketbook.

The Fooducate Team
November 3 at 12:04 EST .

  7 people like this.



   BirdsNest  Our eggs don't have "no stinkin' labels". Since we have our own chickens we know what they eat and how they are treated. Bet those fancy organic people don't go out and dig up worms for their hens. Or pull chickweed or sneak stalks of Swiss chard for them. So far the new hens have not started laying, sometime real soon they should start, they are 5 months old.
November 5 at 18:32 EST .

  12 people like this.



   Balogreene  I'm sorry, I loved fresh eggs from the farm, they are better than store-bought. But, since I live in the suburbs, I buy what I can afford.
November 5 at 19:35 EST .

  7 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Coffee Klatch  




2001 Holiday Inn ad
October 19 at 07:48 EST .

   13 people like this.




   Bettijo posted on Coffee Klatch  



October 17 at 19:10 EST .

   12 people like this.




   Bettijo posted on Main Page The Lobby  "... in the past year, nearly 130,000 immigrants have flooded across the Mexican border, taking advantage of taxpayer-funded benefits. Some experts believe that the hordes of people, primarily Central Americans, are bringing a different virus with them, enterovirus 68. How easily might unknown viruses, including Ebola, cross the southern US border as well?"

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047296_Ebola_outbreak_United_Airl
ines_Thomas_Eric_Duncan.html#ixzz3GPHFqHrr

If we do stop flights from West Africa at our borders, what is to stop infected people from coming through our porous southern border? Those exposed to Ebola (and I can't blame them ) are going to do everything in their power to get to this country for our free health care and humane treatment (they heard about Duncan ). Is our government TRYING to kill us in the name of political correctness? At least two health care workers have been diagnosed with Ebola (I pray for them ) all because one infected immigrant was allowed to fly into out cities. It reminds me of trading five terrorists for one deserter. Except, of course, our dedicated health care workers (and anyone else who happened to be exposed ) are not terrorists--they are the good guys. Yet they are being traded for an infected immigrant who knew he had been exposed. And, in addition, to show their gratitude, I read that Duncan's family is suing claiming he was discriminated against. What about the health care workers? This makes me livid.

If anyone exposed by Duncan's (and our administration's ) irresponsible behavior, that death is on their hands and should be called what it is: homicide.
October 17 at 09:20 EST .

   6 people like this.



   Bettijo  I stole this off another blog:

"We have Ebola in the USA as a direct result of two liars, Thomas Duncan and Barack Obama. One should have never left been allowed to leave Africa and the other needs to be sent back."
October 17 at 09:40 EST .

  6 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Jokes  Finally a clear explanation of unemployment ...

COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America.

ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's 7.8%.

COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?

ABBOTT: No, that's 14.7%.

COSTELLO: You just said 7.8%.

ABBOTT: 7.8% Unemployed.

COSTELLO: Right 7.8% out of work.

ABBOTT: No, that's 14.7%.

COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 14.7% unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, that's 7.8%.

COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 7.8% or 14.7%?

ABBOTT: 7.8% are unemployed. 14.7% are out of work.

COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, Congress said you can't count the "Out of W ork" as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.
COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!!

ABBOTT: No, you miss his point.

COSTELLO: What point?

ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.

COSTELLO: To whom?

ABBOTT: The unemployed.

COSTELLO: But ALL of them are out of work.

ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work. Those who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.

COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment rolls that would count as less unemployment?

ABBOTT: Unemployment would g o down. Absolutely!

COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work?

ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That's how they get it to 7.8%. Otherwise it would be 14.7%. Our govt. doesn't want you to read about 14.7% unemployment.

COSTELLO: That would be tough on those running for reelection.

ABBOTT: Absolutely!

COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number?

ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.

COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?

ABBOTT: Correct.

COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?

ABBOTT: Bingo.

COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work.

ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like an Economist.

COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said!

ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like Congress.
October 14 at 17:20 EST .

   8 people like this.



   Gerty  Ahhhhh...yes!
October 14 at 21:40 EST .

  8 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Coffee Klatch  While the chart says “Census Bureau” at the bottom remember that since the Age of Obama “Census” reports directly to the White House.
   October 13 at 13:01 EST .

   8 people like this.



   Bettijo  Credit above to: http://www.michellesmirror.com/2014/10/v
iva-la-vida-homeland-version.html#.VDwBi
BbNnBZ
October 13 at 13:02 EST .

  8 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on Photography  Can one of you recommend a really good video camera? Thanks.
October 13 at 10:14 EST .

   18 people like this.



   Ole buzzard  Most high end digital SLR cameras also take video. I haven't tried it yet with my Canon XSi, but have the capability.
October 13 at 13:19 EST .

  20 people like this.



   Bettijo  Thanks, Buzz, let me know how this works for you. My daughter wants a dedicated video camera and I am looking for one for her for Christmas. Since I know NOTHING about cameras at all, I am asking for advice from my fellow LDotters who do know about such things. Thanks.
October 17 at 08:41 EST .

  13 people like this.



   Ole buzzard  How much are you looking to spend?
October 18 at 02:13 EST .

  7 people like this.



   Bettijo  Up to $300 max, hopefully closer to $200. Thanks.
October 18 at 20:49 EST .

  16 people like this.



   Ole buzzard  You'll not find much in that range that will give you still and video at a high resolution. The Canon XSi can be found on eBay for under $200 now. Granted, it is used in most cases, but it is a high qualify camera. I love mine.
October 21 at 02:06 EST .

  15 people like this.



   Bettijo  You are right. I did not realize how expensive they were. I found this for $499. Is this what you are talking about?

The Canon EOS Rebel T5 ($549.99 with 18-55mm lens ) is the latest entry-level D-SLR from Canon, and given the brand name, it's likely the one that first-time SLR buyers will gravitate toward. It's priced attractively, a full $100 less than the Nikon D3300, but it lags behind the D3300 in image quality, video options, and burst shooting. If you're set on getting a Canon, the SL1$599.00 at Amazon and the T5i$699.00 at B&H Photo-Video are better-performing cameras. Our favorite D-SLR that's priced at less than $1,000, the Nikon D5300$508.93 at Eglobal Central, is another option.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,245
8301,00.asp
October 23 at 15:44 EST .

  13 people like this.



   Ole buzzard  Both of my SLR cameras (film and digital ) are Canon. I chose Canon primarily because of their quality reputation, although Nikon and Olympus are high quality as well.
October 23 at 20:20 EST .

  9 people like this.





   Bettijo posted on The Road Automobilia  A week or so ago I posted the story of the custom car which was demolished. I deleted that post because it had some mistakes in it. Now, the rest of the story. The car was named Job One and built by Dave Crook in California. It did take 12 or 13 years to build because Dave was working full time designing for GM at the time. I was wrong about the selling price, sorry, it was $350,000....still a lot of money. To refresh, the owner and his wife were driving the car to a local car show. It was so close they did not bother with a trailer, while turning into the show grounds, they were rear-ended by a 16-year-old girl who was texting. The man was airlifted to Mt. Sinai Hospital; as far as I know both he and his wife are still in some rehab facility. The teenager was unhurt. Car was totally demolished. Thought I would post a picture of Job One. Some of you car enthusiast might know of it. Such a sad story.
   October 12 at 15:29 EST .

   19 people like this.




   Bettijo posted on Dogs, Cats & Critters  



   October 12 at 06:42 EST .

   15 people like this.



   Gerty  This is just wonderful, MissBettijo---and if I watch it one more time, I'm going to be late to Church!! Thank you so much for posting.
October 12 at 11:02 EST .

  13 people like this.



   MeiDei  With the exception of the bear, wolf, bald eagle & puma - all live in my backyard - just lovely.
October 12 at 14:14 EST .

  14 people like this.



   Ynaught  Loved it!
October 14 at 06:59 EST .

  5 people like this.



     Next Page